Blog

  • The 5 AM Club: Own Your Morning, Elevate Your Life

    Robin Sharma (2018) Thorsons: London

    When I heard that Anna Wintour, editor of Vogue magazine, started her day at 5am, I concluded that she was crazy. But the title of the 5am club crossed my path, so I looked up what various journalists wrote: “we tried the 5am club and this is what happened …” kind of click bait. I’m not sure that they actually read the book, let alone understood it. 

    The ostensible premise is that getting up and doing stuff at stupid-o’clock will make you successful. Early to bed; early to rise and all that crap. However, that getting up before the lark seems to be the central point of the title, somewhat misses the point of the book. This review, for those still intending to read The 5am Club, is more of a guide on what frame of mind to be in to read and get value from it. I admit, I haven’t given it the customary 21 days, or rather the 66 day programme (to form a habit), a full test yet. That will come as a separate review. 

    I have seen much of this before, but I’d say the reiteration is a good thing in light of what I believe the book’s purpose to be. Tony Robbins’ works, like Unlimited Power and Awaken the Giant Within, are very much reflected – indeed, I think one of the characters, the Spellcaster, may have been part modelled on Robbins. There is a difference in approach though. Robbins’ works are direct presentations of ideas; this is a narrative which throws personal development ideas out through a fictional (and rather implausible) dialogue between three main characters. 

    Reading it, I got drawn into thinking it was a novel. Unfortunately, if it were a novel, it would be shit reading (sorry, Robin): there is no rip-roaring story arc to keep me riveted. I had to keep reminding myself of its purpose as a medium for personal growth, rather than simply a source of entertaining story telling. Furthermore, I needed to maintain my receptivity to the deliriously enthusiastic dialogue. At one time, while trying to read, as a cynical Brit with a sore head and hasn’t had lunch yet, it just became nauseating and my mind shut down to the underlying messages.

    I have made an extensive study of NLP, Ericksonian Hypnosis and just about everything I can find on personal development. I say this, not particularly to indicate where Sharma is coming from in his literary style, but because his means of delivery may be off-putting if not recognised in context, or if this work is mis-read as some kind of thriller. I’m finding it worth reading, however painful at times; it is a large culmination of essential life-lessons, but something not to be read as a conventional story.

    In hypnosis, and much of the talking therapies (which include generative, positive psychology, as well as the remedial) there is significant application of metaphor. Metaphor, in this sense, can range from aesop’s fables to how a story of another person’s actions can be learned from. Stories are how the human race culturally propagates solutions to archetypical problems. It is ages old. I don’t really know what Sharma is doing and I am tempted to go into deep analysis of his delivery methods. Why do so many butterflies and doves keep reappearing throughout the text? Are his choices of locations a kind of Roman Room memory technique to anchor the learning models? To second guess Sharma, in fairness or otherwise, I gather he wanted to embed his models and message in a kind of hypnotic narrative; actually he is very good at it. But let me get a few gripes out of the way so that anyone planning on reading this can absorb the 5am Club’s fundamental utility.

    As I have said, this is not a roller-coaster of a novel, as the writing style betrays. Reading it as such becomes irritating. It is a barrage of “positive thinking” wrapped around any pretext for inspirational quotations from various pundits. Both have their place and when timely can be effective; but page-after-page of copy-pasta aspirational dribble quickly tires. Reviewers on the internet have lambasted this work, wondering how it ever became a bestseller. For anyone who has done much personal development, it’s just a bunch of tropes for conveying positive thinking, they will have heard it all before (though might welcome some reinforcement) but this is laborious; a stuck record. For those who have not encountered personal development, then it’s just a cringeworthy and sluggish way of introducing an attitude and a limited number of  self-improvement models. It often reads like an inspirational poster cobbled together by an AI quote generator.

    At this point, I am urged to defend Sharma and, given what I think he is doing, I could not think of doing it any better; perhaps I’d do it differently though. For those reviewers who, understandably, didn’t bother to read the book, only the title, the message would appear to be to get up early to get stuff done. This is a superficial point however. The underlying learning lesson is about breaking comfortable habits and instigating those, which at first, are difficult (then messy, then glorious). Getting up at 5am is more about stepping out of your comfort zone; a no pain; no gain attitude of over achievers. More importantly, it is about getting into the beneficial habit of forming beneficial habits, so moving into a virtuous circle.

    The point of hypnosis, by using various tales and metaphors, is to impress a point; one that the logical consciousness would be likely to struggle against, yet the deeper mind can absorb and assimilate for its good. The dialogue occurs between the protagonists, but really Sharmer is indirectly addressing the reader through quotes. I was hoping that this would seep into my unconscious mind by osmosis and manifest itself as some kind of second nature. It does actually seem to be having that action in a surprising and pleasing way. I guess that there is some “self-fulfilling prophecy” (as explained in the book) that I expected to kick in.

    Truth be told, I’m blowing hot and cold. Ignore the style: I’m simply reading it, and letting it sink in and integrate. I’m somewhat invested in getting the message and what that message means to me, however sugary the method of delivery. If the good stuff does sink in,  then that’s good by me.

    There is a 66 day online programme to help with the formation of the 5am habit. At the time of editing this review I am the second week into the 66 day challenge, and will detail my experience when I have completed/abandoned that course. Quite frankly, getting active at 5am so far feels like shit, but let’s see how it goes. Very interestingly is that, however much the cringe-inducing regurgitation of positive mental attitude slogans is off putting, an opening up of my thinking seems to be rejecting the dejection I’ve been experiencing of late. Yes, I am still ploughing on as I have been for some time, hoping that one of the many change programmes I’ve been trying would be effective (and yes they have been in their own way). Here though, the ruthless onslaught of PMA seems to be breaking through (I think). I seem a little more focussed on becoming focussed, I’m moving towards doing things that are important to me. I’ve even considered getting back on the entrepreneurial horse (that I kept getting kicked off so many times; I needed some serious reflection time); I may have the killer app in mind (who knows) but the point is that I’m thinking that kind of way once more. With this reflection in mind, I’m thinking that the 66 day challenge won’t be such a grind. 

    Before trying it all out, or at least seeing how far I can get through he programme, it would be worthwhile dispensing with the rather unbelievable story and the way Sharmer relates it, and dig into the meat of the actual content: the learning models and frameworks, that have been entrapped in copious amounts of feel good fluff. One of my pet hates are pet acronyms and mnemonics, or rather those that are just ad-hoc collections lumped together by lazy thinking, as opposed to rigorous science and systematic ordering. Rarely do these things mesh, and modern gurus (and their wide eyed disciples) are prone to believing their ideas are scientific. But the real acid test is: are they embeddable in a pragmatic way – do they work? There is little really in the 5am Club that hasn’t been said more directly elsewhere (or at least I can’t find it), perhaps with the exception of the 20/20/20 formula itself. Notwithstanding, success guides do not have to be entirely unique and this offers a compendium of relevant supporting models. There is an overbearing amount of the 4 of this, the 7 of that, the 12 of the other type of lists; 90/90/1, 60/10, 20/20/20 type rules; if there weren’t so many and they were focussed and well considered, then that would have made it all the more digestible. Looking back over the models has been frustrated too, as they seem to make unannounced appearances under flimsy pretexts sporadically throughout the story. There is no index to them, and I had to flip through the pages hunting for some familiar diagram in order to review the ones I considered the most useful. 

    • The “life-time habit arc” (pp176-181) is a protocol for installing beneficial habits and overriding outmoded ones. It is reminiscent of Christine Carter’s “The Sweet Spot” as it employs triggers and rewards to stimulate and reinforce productive behaviour.
    • The actual “20/20/20 formula” (p206) is the central model of the 5am Club. Sharmer tries to build up some great expectation and I tried not to skip ahead, but reviews (such as this) had already given away spoilers. The “Victory Hour”, between 5 and 6 am is a distraction free time, without technology, intended to set up the day, consisting of 20 minutes “pockets” each of exercise, contemplation, then personal development.
    • The “Amazing Day Deconstruction” (p235, which for some reason was delivered on a thin sheet of glass carried by a drone) is worth bookmarking. It charts a schedule from waking to going to bed at night, including times where technology is prohibited. It offers a flexible guideline, rather than a fixed regime. Importantly it splits out “World Class Work”, to be done between 8am and 1pm when the batteries are fully charged, and “Lower Value Work” between 1pm and 6pm. I am finding this separation useful as it helps me split generative activity (that moves me ever progressively forward) from maintenance activity (eg. administration etc. that merely prevents me from slipping back) .

    There are many fascinating points that are left without citation (which would have been useful, but that is one of the great things about the internet nowadays) and get drowned in a pollyannaish frenzy. One striking distinction was between time management and focus management. Carefully scheduling irrelevant activities is self-defeating; rather concentrate on what is salient, and ditch the distractions. There was also the idea of transient hypofrontality, being in a state of flow, possibly through exercise, where the prefrontal cortex, the chatter-box, shuts up. 

    I’m not totally enamoured by the way the 5am club turned out in its reading. But really, this is actually powerful stuff in terms of re-orienting ourselves and it does provide a good meta-habit and attitude that inspires further thinking, reading and organising. Really, the formula for success is a signpost to the path of discovery.  

    Strange though, after reading this book, I now seem to notice more butterflies and city doves.

  • 1.2.1.1. Life, the Universe and Everything

    therapy etc.

    problem is only a problem in the absense of a solution

    problems are often subjective, though still very real to the subject

    Stable and unstable equilibrium

    Relationship with the environment

    Types of problems and solutions

    other peoples intentions – cooperation, competition

    houristics

    control systems

    communication thinking talking

    structure and instrument

  • 1.6 Arcanum and abstract data types

    6.1 The brain as information processing organ

    6.2 The hierarchy of data

    6.3 Arcana, dreams and thoughts

  • 1.5 Cognitive bias

    1.5.1 Self-fullfilling prophesy

    1.5.2 Believers and skeptics

    1.5.3 What actually is science about?

    1.5.4 The archetecture of influence